Would this be a better logo? Or do you prefer the coloured one?

Views: 50

Comment

You need to be a member of Ooooby to add comments!

Join Ooooby

Comment by Mark Fowler on May 1, 2009 at 5:09pm
The ooooby logo sings in colour! Think rainbows, paints and the outdoors. Suggest you use a gray scale monotone when you need to save on print toner costs for large documents. And interesting aside. In 2004 76% of computer company HP's operating profits were generated by its printing and imaging business. Most of that money comes from selling high-margin ink cartridges. [Source: "Carly's Challenge" - BusinessWeek - 13 December 2004]
Comment by Renee on April 1, 2009 at 11:42am
Keep the colour! Fits the zesty feel of the 'movement'.
Comment by Jude Simpson on April 1, 2009 at 10:09am
Too heavy, not good representation of a plant growing organisation. The original logo of three primary colours plus green is a happy look.
Comment by C.Urchin on March 31, 2009 at 9:06pm
Like the new one Pete , but better in british Racing or Forest Green ...imo Cheers C
Comment by Pete Russell on March 31, 2009 at 6:44pm
Yeah. That is what I was thinking to start moving away from. It was good fun for a while, but we don't need to be associated to google. I'll post another possible logo soon.
Comment by John Howard on March 31, 2009 at 5:21pm
coloured one allways makes me think of the google logo ! nothing wrong with new typeface but maby in green.
Comment by Paula Cook on March 31, 2009 at 3:12pm
Colour one is the best :)
Comment by Craig Hubbard on March 31, 2009 at 1:59am
I do like the simplicity of single black & white, although the colour one is still my pick.
Comment by Emerald on March 30, 2009 at 10:47pm
I like the one with the leaves- perhaps the screen printed version in Olive?
Comment by Derek & Julie Craig on March 30, 2009 at 8:42pm
the coloured one is much nicer.

What's Buzzing? 

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2019   Created by Pete Russell.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service